The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life and the importance of maintaining legislation and order in society.
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment about the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that even though the crime of murder was established, the offender had a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case set a precedent for thinking about mitigating factors during sentencing.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to carry out absent with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced to your period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode here of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court could interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to make it appropriate towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Petitioner getting been declared an absconder in this case for over one in addition to a 50 percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may well avoid standing trial and that's why delay the prosecution on the case. The material on record makes the case on the petitioner falls under two exceptions on the rule of grant of bail as mentioned previously mentioned.
Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Online access to your case management system with the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases may be searched using name or case number.
This case is cited in many subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional law, judicial independence, as well as the rule of regulation.
The scrupulous reader may perhaps have noticed some thing above: a flaw. Beyond the first 7 words, the definition focuses over the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The 2 essential elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to your person, by accomplishing an act which within the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently hazardous that it must in all likelihood cause death, causes the death on the these kinds of person, is alleged to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
Search for websites affiliated with reputable legal institutions or organizations. Validate the information against other sources when possible.
Pakistan’s legal system is not without flaws: overhauling is overdue and also the law regarding murder requires major reconsideration and clarification. With the time being, the the very least that can be carried out is to be certain that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.